| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 262 | |
| 3. |  | AGOSTINETTO, D.; GALON, L.; SILVA, J. M. B. V.; TIRONI, S. P.; ANDRES, A. Interferência e nível de dano econômico de capim-arroz sobre o arroz em função do arranjo de plantas da cultura. Planta Daninha, Viçosa, v. 28, numero expecial, p. 993-1003, 2010.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
|   |
| 4. | | AGOSTINETTO, D.; PIGATTO, C. S.; ZANDONÁ, R. R.; NETO, R. A.; SILVA, B. M. da; ANDRES, A. Interaction of clethodim with glyphosate and/or 2,4-d at different doses and spray volumes in the control of glyphosate-resistant ryegrass. Advances in weed science, 40: e0202200082, p. 1-7, 2022.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
|  |
| 7. | | ALVES, Y. S.; MOISINHO, I. S.; MARTINS, M. B.; SCHREIBER, F.; ANDRES, A. Efeito do tratamento químico e períodos de armazenamento de sementes sobre a germinação do arroz. In: ENCONTRO DE INICIAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA E PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO DA EMBRAPA CLIMA TEMPERADO, 6., 2016, Pelotas. Ciência: Empreendedorismo e inovação: anais. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2016. 168-170| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
| |
| 12. | | ANDRES, A. CONCENCO, G. MELO, P. T. B. S.; SCHMIDT, M.; RESENDE, R. G. Detecção da resistência de capim-arroz (Echinochloa sp.) ao herbicida quinclorac em regiões orizícolas do sul do Brasil. Planta daninha, Campinas, v. 25, n. 1, p. 221-226, 2007. Meta: 2008.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
| |
| 13. | | ANDRES, A.; CONCENCO, G.; SCHREIBER, F.; AGOSTINETTO, D.; VARGAS, L.; BEHENCK, J.; CAPUTO, G. A.; ALVES, Y. S. Predictions for Weed Resistance to Herbicides in Brazil: A Botanical Approach. In: PACANOSKI, Z. (Ed.). Herbicide resistance in weeds and crops. Rijeka: INTECH, 2017, 184 p. Cap. 6.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Clima Temperado; Embrapa Trigo. |
| |
| 14. | | ANDRES, A.; CONCENCO, G.; SCHREIBER, F.; TELÓ, G. M.; FAGUNDES, P. R. R.; MAGALHAES JUNIOR, A. M. de; MOISINHO, I. S.; MARTINS, M. B.; CORADINI, M. C. Habilidade competitiva de genótipos de arroz irrigado com capim-arroz. Pelotas: Embrapa Clima Temperado, 2017. 54 p. (Embrapa Clima Temperado. Boletim de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento, 281).| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
| |
| 15. | | ANDRES, A.; CONCENCO, G.; SCHREIBER, F.; TELÓ, G. M.; GALON, L.; BIANCHI, M. A.; BEHENCK, J. P.; MOISINHO, I. dos S.; MARTINS, M. B.; CORADINI, M. C. Manejo de plantas daninhas na cultura do sorgo sacarino. Pelotas: Embrapa Clima Temperado, 2017. 4 p. (Embrapa Clima Temperado. Comunicado Técnico, 353).| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
| |
| 16. | | ANDRES, A.; CONCENÇO, G.; SCHWANKE, A. M. L.; THEISEN, G.; MELO, P. T. B. S. Períodos de interferência de plantas daninhas na cultura do sorgo forrageiro em terras baixas. Planta Daninha, Viçosa, v. 27, n. 2, p. 229-234, 2009. P. 229-234| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
| |
| 17. | | ANDRES, A.; CONCENCO, G.; THEISEN, G.; GALON, L.; TESIO, F. Management of red rice (Oryza sativa) and barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) grown with sorghum with reduced rate of atrazine and mechanical methods. Experimental Agriculture, Cambridge, v. 48, n. 4, p. 587-596, Oct. 2012.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste; Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
| |
| 20. | | ANDRES, A.; MACIEL JR, F. I.; CORADINI, M. C.; MUNHOS, T. F.; PARFITT, J. M. B.; CONCENCO, G.; MARTINS, M. B. Estratégias para controle de gramíneas na cultura da soja cultivada em sistema de sulco-camalhões de base estreita. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE ARROZ IRRIGADO, 11., 2019. Balneário Camboriú, SC. Inovação e desenvolvimento na orizicultura: anais eletrônico. Itajaí: Epagri/Sosbai, 2019.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 262 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. |
|
Data corrente: |
30/06/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
30/06/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 3 |
|
Autoria: |
ROBERTS, A.; BOECKMAN, C. J.; MÜHL, M.; ROMEIS, J.; TEEM, J. L.; VALICENTE, F. H.; BROWN, J. K.; EDWARDS, M. G.; LEVINE, S. L.; MELNICK, R. L.; ROFRIGUES, T. B.; VÉLEZ, A. M.; ZHOU, X.; HELLMICH, R. L. |
|
Afiliação: |
Andrew Roberts, Agriculture and Food Systems Institute, Washington, DC; Chad J. Boeckman, Corteva Agriscience; Marina Mühl, Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganadería y Pesca, Dirección de Biotecnología, Buenos Aires; Jörg Romeis, Research Division Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Zurich; John L. Teem, Agriculture and Food Systems Institute, Washington, DC; FERNANDO HERCOS VALICENTE, CNPMS; Judith K. Brown, School of Plant Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson; Martin G. Edwards, School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne; Steven L. Levine, Bayer Crop Science, Chesterfield, MO; Rachel L. Melnick, Agriculture and Food Systems Institute, Washington, DC; Thais B. Rodrigues, Greenlight Biosciences, Inc., Medford, MA; Ana M. Vélez, Department of Entomology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Xuguo Zhou, Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY; Richard L. Hellmich, USDA, Corn Insects and Crop Genetics Research Unit, Ames. |
|
Título: |
Sublethal endpoints in non-target organism testing for insect-active GE crops. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, v. 8, article 556, 2020. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00556 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Historically, genetically engineered (GE) plants that have incorporated genes conferring insect protection have primarily used Cry proteins derived from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) to achieve their insecticidal phenotype. As a result, regulators have developed a level of familiarity and confidence in reviewing plants incorporating these insecticidal proteins. However, new technologies have been developed that produce GE plants that incorporate pest protection by triggering an RNA interference (RNAi) response or proteins other than Bt Cry proteins. These technologies have new modes of action. Although the overall assessment paradigm for GE plants is robust, there are ongoing discussions about the appropriate tests and measurement endpoints needed to inform non-target arthropod assessment for technologies that have a different mode of action than the Bt Cry proteins. As a result, increasing attention is being paid to the use of sublethal endpoints and their value for environmental risk assessment (ERA). This review focuses on the current status and history of sublethal endpoint use in insect-active GE crops, and evaluates the future use of sublethal endpoints for new and emerging technologies. It builds upon presentations made at the Workshop on Sublethal Endpoints for Non-target Organism Testing for Non-Bt GE Crops (Washington DC, USA, 4â??5 March 2019), and the discussions of government, academic and industry scientists convened for the purpose of reviewing the progress and status of sublethal endpoint testing in non-target organisms. MenosHistorically, genetically engineered (GE) plants that have incorporated genes conferring insect protection have primarily used Cry proteins derived from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) to achieve their insecticidal phenotype. As a result, regulators have developed a level of familiarity and confidence in reviewing plants incorporating these insecticidal proteins. However, new technologies have been developed that produce GE plants that incorporate pest protection by triggering an RNA interference (RNAi) response or proteins other than Bt Cry proteins. These technologies have new modes of action. Although the overall assessment paradigm for GE plants is robust, there are ongoing discussions about the appropriate tests and measurement endpoints needed to inform non-target arthropod assessment for technologies that have a different mode of action than the Bt Cry proteins. As a result, increasing attention is being paid to the use of sublethal endpoints and their value for environmental risk assessment (ERA). This review focuses on the current status and history of sublethal endpoint use in insect-active GE crops, and evaluates the future use of sublethal endpoints for new and emerging technologies. It builds upon presentations made at the Workshop on Sublethal Endpoints for Non-target Organism Testing for Non-Bt GE Crops (Washington DC, USA, 4â??5 March 2019), and the discussions of government, academic and industry scientists convened for the purpose of reviewing the progress and ... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Organismos não-alvo; Parâmetros subletais; Planta geneticamente modificada. |
|
Thesagro: |
Controle Biológico; Inseto; Melhoramento Genético Vegetal; Planta Transgênica. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/214276/1/Sublethal-endpoints.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02669naa a2200373 a 4500
001 2123519
005 2020-06-30
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00556$2DOI
100 1 $aROBERTS, A.
245 $aSublethal endpoints in non-target organism testing for insect-active GE crops.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
520 $aHistorically, genetically engineered (GE) plants that have incorporated genes conferring insect protection have primarily used Cry proteins derived from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) to achieve their insecticidal phenotype. As a result, regulators have developed a level of familiarity and confidence in reviewing plants incorporating these insecticidal proteins. However, new technologies have been developed that produce GE plants that incorporate pest protection by triggering an RNA interference (RNAi) response or proteins other than Bt Cry proteins. These technologies have new modes of action. Although the overall assessment paradigm for GE plants is robust, there are ongoing discussions about the appropriate tests and measurement endpoints needed to inform non-target arthropod assessment for technologies that have a different mode of action than the Bt Cry proteins. As a result, increasing attention is being paid to the use of sublethal endpoints and their value for environmental risk assessment (ERA). This review focuses on the current status and history of sublethal endpoint use in insect-active GE crops, and evaluates the future use of sublethal endpoints for new and emerging technologies. It builds upon presentations made at the Workshop on Sublethal Endpoints for Non-target Organism Testing for Non-Bt GE Crops (Washington DC, USA, 4â??5 March 2019), and the discussions of government, academic and industry scientists convened for the purpose of reviewing the progress and status of sublethal endpoint testing in non-target organisms.
650 $aControle Biológico
650 $aInseto
650 $aMelhoramento Genético Vegetal
650 $aPlanta Transgênica
653 $aOrganismos não-alvo
653 $aParâmetros subletais
653 $aPlanta geneticamente modificada
700 1 $aBOECKMAN, C. J.
700 1 $aMÜHL, M.
700 1 $aROMEIS, J.
700 1 $aTEEM, J. L.
700 1 $aVALICENTE, F. H.
700 1 $aBROWN, J. K.
700 1 $aEDWARDS, M. G.
700 1 $aLEVINE, S. L.
700 1 $aMELNICK, R. L.
700 1 $aROFRIGUES, T. B.
700 1 $aVÉLEZ, A. M.
700 1 $aZHOU, X.
700 1 $aHELLMICH, R. L.
773 $tFrontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology$gv. 8, article 556, 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Milho e Sorgo (CNPMS) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
